Point taken :-) Less agitating for gap plugging and more gap plugging
on my part would obviously be more helpful.
I'd love to, but I have some other fires to fight right now... FOP is
currently a fairly minor component in our overall system -- thanks in
part historically to these gaps, but that is now a somewhat cyclical
situation...
--
Jess Holle
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Jess, we'll be happy to help you get started if you'd like to work on
these missing features.
On 05.01.2006 12:49:32 Jess Holle wrote:
This page does clearly document the two biggest remaining gaps in 0.90.1:
table Basic §6.7.3
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_table> partial partial
* [0.91 beta] Only border-collapse="separate" is supported and
there's no support for automatic column widths.
and (a smaller, but significant gap):
text-align Basic §7.15.9
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#text-align> partial partial
* Only start, end, center and justify are supported
text-align-last Extended §7.15.10
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#text-align-last> partial
partial
* Only start, end, center and justify are supported
[The gap being the lack of the <string> option for text alignment to
attain alignment to a decimal separation character.]
--
Jess Holle
gerhard oettl wrote:
I always found the compliance page of the documentation a
excelent help when to decide who is to blame: fop or me. What i
am missing is the status of the xsl-funtions [from-parent(),
etc].
If there is no objection i'll try to create a patch against
xdocs/compliance.ihtml to append them.
gerhard
Jeremias Maerki
|
- Re: FOP 0.90.1 Gaps (Was Re: xsl-functions on doc complian... Jess Holle
-