Hey, Simon is on the PMC, so he should know. Just joking. Back to business: There is a recent thread on legal-discuss that should shed some light into this: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200601.mbox/browser
Looks like I was taking this a little too strict earlier. And it turns out that the copyright year thing will likely soon be a thing of the past anyway. HTH On 14.01.2006 01:52:31 Manuel Mall wrote: <snip/> > > It is quite equivocal for me. On the one hand it speaks about new > > significant content, which would mean: leave out 2005. On the other > > it speaks about a range of years due to the public accessibility > > (meaning continuous publication?), which would mean: 1999-2006. > > > > Simon, > > good point and I don't know the answer. My interpretation was to leave > the 2005 out but I can see that leaving it in can be sensibly argued as > well. > > But that's what we have our PMC for don't we? > > PMC please tell us committers how these ASF rules should be interpreted > in the XMLGRAPHICS project. Jeremias Maerki
