On 12.04.2006 13:55:44 Peter West wrote: <snip/> > Is there other than accidental co-ordination between commons, batik and > fop?
"Accidental"? ATM, no coordination is required for releasing Commons as Batik doesn't use it, yet. The plan for XML Graphics Commons on the Wiki is still valid and provides the base for work on Commons. FOP 0.92 will still use Batik 1.6 as we can redistribute only released JAR files. No snapshot JARs as in the past. Coordination as necessary between subprojects in XML Graphics happens on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > What guidance will there be for users in co-ordinating versions of > the three? I don't understand the question, sorry. Jeremias Maerki
