Thanks everyone. I know now which way to go. On 11.07.2006 20:14:59 Finn Bock wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > One of my clients reported to me that he gets a "Should be first" error > > message on the log. This happens in (Page)BreakingAlgorithm.removeNode(). > > I get the impression that the code there is not finished rather than > > that is a real error condition. > > Correct. In BreakingAlgorithm, at least, I simply didn't bother to > implement the out-of-order removing because I thought it wouldn't happen. > > Adding conditions and flags, such as found in PageBreakingAlgorithm > seems unnecessary to me. > > Just unconditionally remove the node in the single-linked list. > > regards, > finn
Jeremias Maerki
