On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just bumped into this and started wondering: currently FObj.bind() > has public visibility, but it seems that protected would suffice. The > method is only accessed by processNode() (which is already a > protected method), but since it needs to be overridden by subclasses, > it cannot be made private. > > Simply wondering whether it would not be 'cleaner' to restrict the > visibility to protected... unless it is really necessary for some > reason to expose it as part of the public API of FObj?
I guess it needs to be invoked after creating an FObj, so it should have the same visibility as the creator method. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
