DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-03 12:02 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I have constantly read statements, which claimed Trunk was able to process > much > larger documents, which I also interpreted as a much smaller memory food > print. It's not that simple, I'm afraid... Although most reports we have received so far indeed indicate that 0.9x is generally faster and uses less resources, this greatly depends greatly on the structure of your FO document. The use of multiple, relatively small page-sequences is a key factor here. If a document is divided nicely into sequences of 10 pages maximum, then the total number of pages becomes irrelevant. We've had feedback from users processing 12000 paged documents without complaints (although the heap still grows to about 0.5GB). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
