DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41426>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41426 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-23 09:45 ------- FYI: Adrian recently discovered that one of our examples generates SEVERE errors due to the usage of fo:wrapper as direct descendant of the fo:flow (= advanced/cid-fonts.fo) The reason being the bare white-space node descendants of the wrapper --ultimately collapsed, that's true, but whitespace handling is done later... As a workaround there, the usage of fo:wrapper could easily be avoided, I think, because it is merely used for inherited properties... These might as well be specified on the fo:flow itself, and overridden only for the trailing fo:table (which is not enclosed by the fo:wrapper), if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
