DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-04 02:56 ------- I think this is a step in the right direction, but I believe the PercentBase shouldn't be LengthBase.CONTAINING_REFAREA_HEIGHT but LengthBase.CONTAINING_BLOCK_HEIGHT. i-p-d, b-p-d, width and height are all using CONTAINING_BLOCK_WIDTH/HEIGHT as per the spec. top, left etc. are also defined in terms of the containing block, not the nearest ancestor reference area. In your example, that would place all three inner b-cs at the upper edge of the block-container's content area because the block they are enclosed in doesn't have a height in this case. Only if you remove the block between the inner and outer b-c will the vertical positioning work again. It's what I would expect in terms of behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
