On Wednesday 18 July 2007 23:15, Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007 19:01, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 2007, at 10:15, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > > J.Pietschmann a écrit :
> > >> Brad Smith wrote:
<snip/>
> Turned out adding basic support for
> keep-together.within-line="always" was fairly simple. So I will
> commit a patch shortly.
>
Moving this thread to fop-dev.
This proposed patch seems to cause a side-effect I would like a
clarification on. The following fo snippet
<fo:block keep-together="always">some long text</fo:block>
used to have the effect of keeping "some long text" on a single page.
After my patch it would also keep "some long text" on a single line!
keep-together is an inherited property and it seems
keep-together="always"
is just a shorthand for
keep-together.within-page="always"
keep-together.within-line="always"
keep-together.within-column="always"
This could mean existing fos which render fine now will render
diffrently after support for keep-together.within-line="always" has
been added.
I guess that is acceptable but rather wanted to check before.
Manuel
>
> <snip/>
>
> > Cheers
> >
> > Andreas
>
