https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579
--- Comment #33 from Luca Furini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-14 07:37:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #32) > The footnote does not fit, not even one line, but the > table-footer cannot be moved (either completely or partially) to the next page > either. Brilliant investigation, Andreas! So there are two main differences between "normal" footnotes and those in table-header / footer (when table-omit-*-at-break = false), as the latters: - need to be repeated in each page where their related table appears - cannot be "delayed" to the next page as this would lead to a duplication, nor they can be moved together with the header >From the implementation point of view, this seems to suggest that, as the table-header (or footer) and its footnotes are actually indivisible (*), their overall length could be used to generate the table elements ... altough this would not be 100% accurate as the proper space resolution with the other surrounding footnotes would be lost. Mmhh, I need to think about this some more time ... (*) Well, there is at least a case when partially deferring table-footer footnotes would not be completely ugly: when the table content is finished, so that there would not be footnote repetition in the next page -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
