https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #2 from Simon Pepping <spepp...@apache.org> 2011-02-07 03:22:51 EST --- I know. I created that to be able to work with block-level content in inline-level content. An inline LM may have block-level LMs in its subtree. I solved the problem by letting an inline-level LM receive List<KnuthSequence>, where each sequence of inline-level layout would be in one InlineKnuthSequence, and block-level layout would generate BlockKnuthSequences. At the time I did this, there were no generics yet. I have long been aware that this violates type safety, but I do not know a solution. LM.getNextKnuthElements is called for block and inline-level LMs alike, but the structure of their subtrees is different. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
