BTW, if someone would bother to nominate me as a committer, I would be happy
to do this work directly. I don't like depending on the other committers to
make progress in this area any more than you like having to address it.

G.

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

> OK, understand on the junit headless issue. For checkstyle/findbugs it
> would be useful to fail the nightly build if they do not pass. I will
> investigate the necessary changes to enable this option, which I hope can be
> adopted.
>
> G.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Simon Pepping <spepp...@leverkruid.eu>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:25:20AM -0700, Glenn Adams wrote:
>> > I notice also that the nightly build target does not run all the junit
>> > tests. It would be better if it run all of them plus checkstyle and
>> > findbugs.
>>
>> Many junit tests require a display. Nightly builds are run in a
>> headless configuration, hence I had to disable many junit tests. At
>> nightly builds there is no one to check checkstyle and findbugs errors
>> and warnings; therefore there is no point in running them.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
>

Reply via email to