https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51052
--- Comment #7 from Andreas L. Delmelle <[email protected]> 2011-04-16 14:54:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > In the same sense, one could reason that the marker's child blocks, tables, > lists etc. all should not be created, and we should store the FO source rather > than parsing them into FONodes. > There might be good points for, but also against. Note: I am not necessarily against this myself. It would be pretty cool, actually, if we were to store only the raw FO source of the marker-subtree, in a CharBuffer, to be parsed later. At first glance, it could turn out to be slightly more efficient in terms of memory footprint. I'd need to see proof to be certain, but it might... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
