https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44885
--- Comment #11 from Andreas L. Delmelle <[email protected]> 2011-04-19 17:43:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for your patch, Andreas! One question... > > > New rough patch. Only confirmed that it renders the attached sample exactly > > the > > same as before. Layout unit tests all seem to be unaffected, as expected. > > Some > > checkstyle issues, I know. Definitely still far too sketchy and also > > generates > > too much overhead. > > Is this overhead also present if inline-container elements are not used? That's a definite No. Only documents actually using fo:inline-container would be affected. The overhead I am referring to specifically, is the 'abuse' of PageBreakingAlgorithm. While the approach makes sense for absolute-positioned or rotated block-containers --and may turn out to be unavoidable for similar inline-containers-, regular block-containers would generate less overhead than regular inline-containers, which seems wrong somehow...? I am worried that a document with, say 200 inline-containers would generate just as many PageBreakingAlgorithms, and those can hardly be considered light-weight objects. Those instances will take up valuable heap space, since they are all kept alive until the parent's addAreas() has been called... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
