Ok, then... +1 for me 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>: > If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge > to trunk. So I'd say +1. > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure >> it's time to merge such branch to trunk. >> I guess this new feature will not be part of the 1.1 release. >> >> If merging have to be done quickly, then we should create a 1.1 >> maintenance branch to ensure that merging will not affect the >> releasing process. >> >> Or if this new feature have to be part of the 1.1 release, then >> perhaps we have to delay the release process *after* this merge. >> >> any thought? >> >> 2012/6/15 Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>: >> > As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the >> > Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some >> > clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). >> > >> > We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and >> > it has proven to work reasonably well. I won’t hide the fact that some >> > parts of the code are truly ugly (in PSFontUtils mainly), but it’s not >> > possible to clean that up without heavily refactoring the font >> > sub-system, which I unfortunately can’t spend time on right now. At >> > least the ugliness is fairly self-contained. Meanwhile some users may >> > find the additional functionality useful. >> > >> > So I’d like to propose a vote for merging that branch back to Trunk. The >> > vote will run until Thursday 21st, 8:00GMT. >> > >> > Here’s my +1. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Vincent
-- pascal
