I see, but it seems that I still do not understand this.
If I e.g. try this to get the "X IN A RECTANGLE BOX" glyph:
<fo:block font-family="Wingdings">x</fo:block>
<fo:block font-family="Wingdings">⌧</fo:block>
<fo:block font-family="Wingdings">ग</fo:block>
I still get:
Glyph "x" (0x78, x) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "⌧" (0x2327, clear) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "ग" (0x917, gadeva) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
The font is added with the auto-detect feature. Do I need to take some
additional steps to get this to work?
På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:00:58 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams <[email protected]>:
1.0 was broken in the sense that it mis-interpreted character codes
according to the native font encoding, while 1.1 correctly interprets as
Unicode only; in other words, 1.1 conforms to XSL-FO with respect to the
interpretation of character codes, while 1.0 did not always do so; your
test file depends (wrongly) on this broken 1.0 behavior;
as I have said previously, you need to use Unicode encodings; see the
following page for some information on a possible Unicode mapping for
Wingding
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan/wingdings/proposal/
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Håkon Clausen <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks,
I have attached the PDF output, which is a-z and A-Z. In 1.1 you get no
correct output, not for i-z either.
Why is this working in 1.0 when the glyphs does not exists and why is
not
1.1 working for the other glyphs?
Håkon
På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:56:03 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams
<[email protected]>:
Wingdings does not contain 'a' through 'h'. You need to use the proper
Unicode character codes as supported by Wingdings.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Håkon Clausen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I have wingdings font installed on my system (
http://webfonts.googlecode.*
*com/files/wingding.ttf<http:/**/webfonts.googlecode.com/**
files/wingding.ttf
<http://webfonts.googlecode.com/files/wingding.ttf>>)
and using attached fo file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected
but
in 1.1RC1 it failes with:
Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Any advice or is this a bug?
--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
+47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc
--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
+47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc
