[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15030875#comment-15030875 ]
Andreas L. Delmelle commented on FOP-2540: ------------------------------------------ Thinking some more about the current state of "codepoint-to-glyph" mappings, and IIUC, the 1-1 correspondence that is currently enforced by the code would be insufficient for a number of cases, i.e. not only the extra roman-to-symbol mappings that are supported by Windows and Mac Symbol fonts. I am thinking that, more generally, there may be cases where a font simply does not have a glyph for a certain codepoint, but wants to map that codepoint to another glyph. Example would be different types of dashes or spaces. A non-breaking space could theoretically be mapped to the very same 'glyph' (representing an empty space, obviously) as a regular space. An em-dash could be mapped to a regular minus sign. Things like that... This would not be supported by the current code, if I catch correctly, since as soon as an "eight-bit-glyph" is mapped once, it cannot be mapped again. In the other direction, it would likely be very rare situations. I cannot immediately think of use cases for mapping a single codepoint to more than one glyph...? > Enhance TTF/OTF support beyond Windows > -------------------------------------- > > Key: FOP-2540 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2540 > Project: FOP > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: font/opentype > Affects Versions: 2.0 > Environment: OS X > Reporter: Andreas L. Delmelle > Assignee: Andreas L. Delmelle > Priority: Minor > Attachments: FOP-2540.patch, test_osx_fonts_after_1.log, > test_osx_fonts_before.log > > > Currently, cmap tables in TTF/OTF are only supported for Platform ID = 3, > i.e. MS Windows. There is no support for Platform ID = 0, i.e. basic Unicode, > or 1, i.e. Macintosh. > This makes quite some system fonts bundled with OS X supposedly unusable. The > solution is fairly trivial (patch proposal will be attached shortly), > provided the cmap table format in the font is already supported. FOP > currently only has support for cmap format 4 (segment to delta mapping), but > this seems to suffice for most of the Unicode cmaps as well. > See also FOP-2539, which triggered me to investigate this closer. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)