[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-3144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Franci updated FOP-3144:
-------------------------------
Description:
I would like to create a PDF which have both a PDF/A and PDF/UA profile active.
It seems validators do not accept the generated property :
{code:java}
<rdf:Description xmlns:pdfuaid="http://www.aiim.org/pdfua/ns/id/" rdf:about="">
<pdfuaid:part>1</pdfuaid:part>
</rdf:Description> {code}
So maybe the issue is not with FOP but with the compatibility of the two
standards or with the validators.
Do you have any clues about it?
I tried a few configurations, for example :
{code:java}
<renderer mime="application/pdf">
<pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
<pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-1a</pdf-a-mode>
<version>1.4</version>
...
</renderer>
{code}
Or
{code:java}
<renderer mime="application/pdf">
<pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
<pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-2a</pdf-a-mode>
<version>1.7</version>
...
</renderer>
{code}
The PDF/UA validation succeds (I tried [https://check.axes4.com/en/]),
but the PDF/A validation fails (I tried adobe and
[https://avepdf.com/en/pdfa-validation]
[),|https://avepdf.com/en/pdfa-validation] with this error :
{color:#ff0000}XMP property pdfuaid:part not defined in current schema.{color}
Thanks in advance.
was:
I would like to create a PDF which have both a PDF/A and PDF/UA profile active.
It seems validators do not accept the generated property :
{code:java}
<rdf:Description xmlns:pdfuaid="http://www.aiim.org/pdfua/ns/id/" rdf:about="">
<pdfuaid:part>1</pdfuaid:part>
</rdf:Description> {code}
So maybe the issue is not with FOP but with the compatibility of the two
standards or with the validators.
Do you have any clues about it?
I tried a few configurations, for example :
{code:java}
<renderer mime="application/pdf">
<pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
<pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-1a</pdf-a-mode>
<version>1.4</version>
...
</renderer>
{code}
Or
{code:java}
<renderer mime="application/pdf">
<pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
<pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-2a</pdf-a-mode>
<version>1.7</version>
...
</renderer>
{code}
The PDF/UA validation succeds (I tried https://check.axes4.com/en/),
but the PDF/A validation fails (I tried adobe and
[https://check.axes4.com/en/),] with this error :
{color:#ff0000}XMP property pdfuaid:part not defined in current schema.{color}
Thanks in advance.
> Is it possible to create a PDF which is both PDF/A and PDF/UA compliant?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FOP-3144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-3144
> Project: FOP
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: renderer/pdf
> Affects Versions: 2.8
> Reporter: Matteo Franci
> Priority: Major
>
> I would like to create a PDF which have both a PDF/A and PDF/UA profile
> active.
> It seems validators do not accept the generated property :
> {code:java}
> <rdf:Description xmlns:pdfuaid="http://www.aiim.org/pdfua/ns/id/"
> rdf:about="">
> <pdfuaid:part>1</pdfuaid:part>
> </rdf:Description> {code}
> So maybe the issue is not with FOP but with the compatibility of the two
> standards or with the validators.
> Do you have any clues about it?
> I tried a few configurations, for example :
>
> {code:java}
> <renderer mime="application/pdf">
> <pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
> <pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-1a</pdf-a-mode>
> <version>1.4</version>
> ...
> </renderer>
> {code}
> Or
> {code:java}
> <renderer mime="application/pdf">
> <pdf-ua-mode>PDF/UA-1</pdf-ua-mode>
> <pdf-a-mode>PDF/A-2a</pdf-a-mode>
> <version>1.7</version>
> ...
> </renderer>
> {code}
> The PDF/UA validation succeds (I tried [https://check.axes4.com/en/]),
> but the PDF/A validation fails (I tried adobe and
> [https://avepdf.com/en/pdfa-validation]
> [),|https://avepdf.com/en/pdfa-validation] with this error :
>
> {color:#ff0000}XMP property pdfuaid:part not defined in current schema.{color}
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)