> > So basically, the nuts are on the anvil?  I hope no-one reads this 
> > mailing list.

Or just run a search on Google in a few days. 

Better not put any fudges on your resume that can be contradicted by any
post you've *ever* made to a newsgroup, mailing list or website. At least
not if you have an uncommon name like mine.


Matt Savino
Senior Systems Analyst
Quest Diagnostics Clinical Trials



> -----Original Message-----
> From: C Brian O'Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XMLSpy - FOP
> 
> 
> Random question, but is there incentive for a company to hire 
> someone to enhance FOP and release the updates to the public 
> domain? Are most of the developers employed to do this, or is 
> this done in their free time?
> Brian
> 
> On Wed, 27 February 2002, "Peter B. West" wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Savino, Matt C wrote:
> > 
> > >  I regretted the tone of that last email as soon as
> > >I spit it out. I'm just not having a very great day. I 
> know from watching
> > >the fop-dev list for the last year or so that all the 
> active players on FOP
> > >are very concientious, hard-working and know what they're 
> doing. Maybe you
> > >can look at my little outburst as a rare window into the 
> frustrations that
> > >some of the end users are feeling but have the tact to withhold.
> > >
> > I think your comments will be read in that light.
> > 
> > >...
> > >  I've sort of become the chief FOP evangelist/programmer.
> > > ...  People are starting to look at my PDF solution. I'm 
> just afraid
> > >they're going to look behind the curtain and see that I 
> can't generate five
> > >10-page reports at once (or one 100-page report) on one 
> instance of Weblogic
> > >running on $80k worth of hardware--w/o running out of 
> memory or coming to a
> > >standstill.
> > >
> > So basically, the nuts are on the anvil?  I hope no-one reads this 
> > mailing list.
> > 
> > >
> > >I guess even the roughest non-binding ETA on the redesign 
> might help some of
> > >us sleep better at night - 6 mos?
> > >
> > ***
> > 
> > > 1 year?
> > >
> > *** My guess.  I think the design is getting towards 
> critical mass.  See 
> > my other post responding to Arved.
> > 
> > > 2 years? more? And just out of
> > >curiosity, why are you starving to finish this - love? 
> future consulting
> > >gigs? both?
> > >
> > Things slowed down a lot after dot.con, and here in 
> Brisbane they were 
> > slow to start with.  I have a (voluntary) application for 
> FOP, and I had 
> > a need to learn Java to spruce up my skill set.  Future 
> consulting?  I 
> > suppose I can dream.
> > 
> > Peter
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to