On 13.04.2003 00:15:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > starting with red hat's "xmlto" utility and the most recent > docbook stylesheets, i hacked the "xmlto" utility to accept a > request to use FOP (rather than passivetex) to do the FO -> PDF > step, and it's not only *way* faster than passivetex, the output > is actually more correct.
HEAR, HEAR! > however, even though i get output, i still get the following > warnings/errors, so can anyone tell me what params (if any) i > can use to make them go away? > > i remember a discussion about language choice for hyphenation, > but i checked the entire FO parameter list, and all i see is > a parameter as to whether i want hyphenation or not, nothing > about a language choice. > [ERROR] Couldn't find hyphenation pattern en > [ERROR] Error building hyphenation tree for language en The "en" hyphenation pattern had to be removed because of licensing problems. You can use "en_GB" for the moment or switch off hyphenation. > [ERROR] Unknown formatting object http://www.tug.org/fotex^bookmark > [ERROR] no handler defined for http://www.tug.org/fotex:bookmark foreign xml > [ERROR] Unknown formatting object http://www.tug.org/fotex^sort > [ERROR] no handler defined for http://www.tug.org/fotex:sort foreign xml The "no handler defined" messages come from a special extension for passivetex. You need to switch to the equivalent in FOP. See: http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions.html Bookmarks are supported by FOP, but I don't know what that "sort" thing does. > anyway, suggestions on how to minimize the following?? I hope that helps. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
