Yup. CVS tag "fop-0_20_2-maintain" as described here: http://xml.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html
On 06.05.2003 13:33:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2003, Victor Mote wrote: > > > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > i first tried to solve this with the latest CVS FOP build, > > > which is *definitely* not ready for prime time. > > > > As mentioned in my post on the other thread, you probably have built the > > trunk code, and you are correct, it is not very usable. If you get the right > > branch, you should be getting the best version of FOP yet produced AFAIK. > > > > > however, when i process that .fo file with FOP, i get the image > > > appearing *twice*. this is definitely not good behavior. > > > > This is a known bug in 0.20.5rc2: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17472 > > and it has been fixed in CVS. > > what do you mean by the "right branch" of CVS? upon careful reading, > i see that there are the two branches: maintenance and redesign. > > the one i tried a couple of days ago was a CVS snapshot, and it changed > my output content in pretty significant ways. > > so what's the ideal and most stable CVS version to get? the maintenance > version? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
