Whoops! That should've been...
(I'm speaking from experience, and *NOT* the perspective of intimate knowledge of "the XSL-FO spec").
hehehe... my bad!
On 6/26/2003 9:27 AM, Clay Leeds wrote:
Sebastien,
On 6/26/2003 7:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I know that, the xsl fo equivalent of <br> is <fo:block/>
Actually, I believe the equivalent of <br> is <fo:block> </fo:block> because the <fo:block> element requires content (I'm speaking from experience, and the perspective of intimate knowledge of "the XSL-FO spec").
HTH!
-- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
