> From: Jay Chiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 1. This is an alternative way I try to solve the FOP absolute > positoned block-container issue. >
Great. Can u send us an example of the fo containing the svg ( always interested in having a look at that to see if we can provide a working alternative... ) > 2. The FOP version is fop-0.20.5 with batik jar and tried with > batik version 1.5. > Standard config indeed. Should pose no problems... > I am affraid that FOP does not contain Batik extension because > FOP developor did not feel it is easy to add. > I don't exactly get the picture of what is being meant by this? FOP should, apart from the known issues, be more than sufficiently supporting SVG, either external or embedded, in order to help you out here... I think. Greetz, Andreas Delmelle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
