In fact I didn't try each subversion between 0.20.1 and 0.20.5 to see where the problem appeared, but it is certain that TIFF image memory management is far worth in this latter version (for my case): so I stay stucked with 0.20.1 because I can render 4 times bigger FO files with version 0.20.1 than with version 0.20.5.
-----Message d'origine----- De : Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 13 novembre 2003 10:19 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: Problems using Tiff with FOP > -----Original Message----- > From: Cavallini David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I got the same problem with FOP 0.20.5: I could not render documents with more than about > 150/200 pages with 1 TIFF per page (OutOfMemory). I tried to remove the image cache > management in FOP source code but it didn't help. > For now I use FOP 0.20.1 with which I can render about 1000 pages documents with That's quite old... What exactly is the advantage for you in using 0.20.1 vs. 0.20.5? As I understand, a few optimization patches were applied in the meantime (not specifically WRT images, that's true). > 800 mbytes JVM option (-Xms800m -Xmx800m). My target would be 4000 pages documents > but it does not seem possible by now with FOP. Perhaps best to perform some post-processing with iText (generate a few smaller PDFs and collate them). Greetz, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
