Ada would have let you use the same code for all of your implementations. A version of the GNU (GNAT) Ada compiler generates ECMA, which is used in .NET. Parenthetically, the ECMA compiler was based on the GNAT J code generator. Bob Leif
-----Original Message----- From: Gunnar Liljas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP.NET > We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open > Source components written in Java. > You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To get it in C# one would have to rewrite the entire thing (although help is available in the form om Java Language Conversion Assistant in Visual Studio). A C# FOP would preferrably use the pull architecture of the XMLReader in .NET, instead of the SAX Parser. NFOP is in J#, and while it may be worth using in a .NET environment, J# is still a strange animal. /G --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
