Oops! I did use the "-enc ansi" when attempting to build my own font
class, but I never tried actually using that font metric file. It does
reduce the time drastically, to within a couple tenths of a second of a
Base-14 font.
Since I am new to font creation, what is reason for the better performance?
The best I can determine is that with WINANSI, we access the encoded
letters directly and with CID we access the glyphs to build the
letters??????????
Thanks for you help!
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
stems.com
To
02/24/2004 04:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM cc
Subject
Please respond to Re: non Base-14 fonts and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] performance.
he.org
I did try that by using the "-enc ansi" parameter on the TTFReader program.
The results I noted earlier reflect that font metric generation.
Thanks,
Scott
"J.Pietschmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e> To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/24/2004 04:01 cc
PM
Subject
Re: non Base-14 fonts and
Please respond to performance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> During performance tuning, I came across the issue of non Base-14 fonts
> killing performance. I have a pdf that renders in 20 seconds using the
> Helvetica font but when the font is changed to a ttf file via the
> userconfig.xml, the render time takes 2 minutes or more.
...
> Does anybody else know what might be happening?
If you use only the ASCII/ISO-8859-1 part of the font, try to
generate the metrics with -winansi encoding (or roughly like
this).
J.Pietschmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
