Clay Leeds wrote: > On a related note, I found the FOP site's RTF I couldn't find > before[1] (it was 'hidden' on the /fop/dev side). Also, I
Be careful here. There are two components in play. One is the rtflib stuff, which you find on the /fop/dev side. The other is the RTF renderer which uses rtflib to generate the RTF document from FOP. They are deliberately kept separate, because rtflib is useful for other things besides FOP, and should not be at all dependent on FOP. That is why it is listed on the dev web page as a "subpackage". It could be (and IMO should be) kept independent. At least this is the way it was about six months ago. This goes very much to the modular/monolithic debate on fop-dev, and perhaps this has been changed by active developers since I last saw it. But I would be careful about how you document it. The rtflib documentation really *is* of interest only for developers. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
