What I was interested in doing was taking the usable page width and dividing that by #columns so I could use this derived fixed column width for each <fo:table-column column-width="?"> tag.
I could use width="100%" on the table, but I thought that the subsequent column-width="33%" was not supported. Mike --- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Kellstrand wrote: > > > Yes, that was plan B. > > > > What I really need is the usable width, > > i.e. page-width - left-margin - right-margin. > > > > If FOP could cough that up it would be cool, > > otherwise as you said, I could define some > variable(s) > > at the top and reference them. > > What's wrong with width="100%" for the table? Have > a look at proportional-column-width() too. > > J.Pietschmann __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
