(Jay's suggestion just rolled in --I'm not 100% sure, but I think FOP will complain if it encounters attributes in the fo: namespace that are not properties as defined in the Rec. FOP 0.20.5 may turn out to be forgiving... Just to be on the safe side, I'd use a separate namespace.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- I hadn't thought of that because I always do all my processing against some other XML dialect and generate FO as the last step. A separate namespace would be the way to go, for sure. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
