On Saturday 06 May 2006 23:14, Charles Griswold wrote: > Paul Tremblay wrote: <snip/> > The only issue we've encountered is a significant memory leak on > successive reports. Initial testing seems to indicate a loss of about > 100m with each execution. > We have no solution to this issue other than to invoke the XSLT-FOP > as a separate task on each execution. This approach insures a new > JVM on each execution. > Charles,
can you please advise with which version(s) of fop you observed the memory leak? Thanks Manuel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
