On Aug 8, 2006, at 22:27, Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) wrote:
Hi,
One feature that seems to be still under development is the
keep-with-next / keep-with-previous attributes. From the conformance
table on the FOP website it wasn't clear if those attributes works on
*any* of the table features. Is that a correct conclusion?
Not entirely. From what I could dig up in the archives, keep-together
and keep-with-next should work on table nodes... It's only keep-with-
previous that has the mentioned restriction.
Is there a work-around to hold a table together and not get broken
across pages?
See above. Chances are you may not need a workaround.
At any rate: if you're using the table only as the 0.20.5 workaround
for keep-together, then you might consider switching to a block
structure.
HTH!
Cheers,
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
