Yes it was a docbook thin, sorry for that. The problem was that the sub sections were stored in a para element instead in another section element. Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. August 2006 11:36 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Does FOP not care about section.autolabel.max.depth? Remo Liechti wrote: <snip/> > this generates: > 1. section one > 1.1 section one dot one > section one dot one dot one > > 1.2 section one dot two > section one dot two dot one > > 2. section two > 2.1 section two dot one > > You see, it only goes down one node... to tell the FOP to go down more > steps, a property exists: > section.autolabel.max.depth No, this property does not tell FOP anything. It tells docbook.xsl how to create the XSL-FO. This is a docbook problem ask on the docbook mailing list. <snip/> Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, if he/she is not named as addressee. The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity and punctuality of this message. The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning, but does not guarantee the virus free transmission of this message. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
