Thanks. I needed to know that I wasn't completely off the mark on this one. -Lou
Andreas Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/29/2008 03:13:39 PM: > On Feb 29, 2008, at 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Lou > > It should definitely work. That is: it is a perfectly legitimate > value for column-width. > So it's certainly nothing you're doing wrong (if you needed > confirmation) > > > A small correction... > > > > The following work OK: > > > > <fo:table-column column-width="20mm+proportional-column-width(1)"/> > > > > The following results in the table running off page: > > > > <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)+20mm"/> > > Had a quick look at the code, and at the side of the FO properties, > everything seems to be still OK. > > Both cases yield a column-width that is a RelativeNumericProperty > consisting of two operands: > * a FixedLength of 56692mpt > * a TableColLength of 1 table-unit > > It seems that, when the FixedLength is specified first, the > computation of table-units is based on the table-width minus the > FixedLength, but when the FixedLength is the second operand, the > FixedLengths are not subtracted of the table-width... > > I'll have a closer look, and see what I can find out. In the > meantime, you have already found the workaround. > > > Cheers > > Andreas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
