Ulrich,
We found fop 0.20.5 required these fonts on some RH versions, even in
headless mode:
xorg-x11-deprecated-lib
The fop errors we saw were different, but still misleading.
I don't think java 1.6 was around when that version of FOP was written
either FWIW.
Regards,
*Roland *
Ulrich Mayring wrote:
Chris Bowditch wrote:
v0.9x is a complete re-write of 0.20.5 so I don't think that is a
fair assumption.
AFAIK the dependency on a graphical environment was due to Batik, so
the complete rewrite of fop may not have any bearing on this issue.
I am guessing that some X libraries weren't installed, is there any
information which ones are actually needed?
If that were true then specifying -Djava.awt.headless=true would
resolve the issue. Its more likely that FOP got stuck in an infinite
loop due to some complex FO that you gave it.
No, I can disprove that.
Fop works fine on any machine not running Fedora 9. In fact it worked
fine on Fedora 4 and after doing nothing else but upgrading that
machine to Fedora 9 it broke.
The only explanation I can think of is the X libraries issue.
Ulrich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail is solely for the use of the intended recipient and may
contain information which is confidential or privileged. Any
unauthorised use of its contents is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via return e-mail and
then delete the original e-mail.
This e-mail is solely for the use of the intended recipient and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use of its
contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender via return e-mail and then delete the original e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
