Hi,

Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2009, at 17:58, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> 
>> On 24 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Georg Datterl wrote:
>>
>>> What does this message mean?
>>
>> It's a warning message, indicating that the current keep-context is
>> set to auto, but the keep-property specified on the FO for which
>> layout/breaking is performed, has a different value.
> 
> Note: AFAICT, this message mainly originates from keeps on
> table-elements for which they are not completely implemented yet.
> fo:table-cells are an example where support for keeps is lacking, but
> since it does work for fo:table-row, and fo:table-cell inherits the
> value from its ancestors...

Keeps do /not/ apply to fo:table-cell:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#fo_table-cell

Keeps are fully implemented on all supported table elements to which
they apply, that is fo:table and fo:table-row (the fo:table-and-caption
and fo:table-caption elements are not supported at all).

Keep-together is an inherited property, so the descendant elements of
fo:table-cell to which that property applies will behave accordingly.
But the code related to table-cell has nothing special to do.

So whatever that warning means, it is not related to tables.


> At any rate, it has no noticeable effect on the output. The warning
> appears for some testcases as well, but would disappear if keeps on
> table-cells would be properly implemented.


Vincent

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Reply via email to