Hi Romit,

I have come across something similar before when I was working on the following 
patch for FOP:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2104

It was caused by there being a mismatch with one of the FO table elements being 
converted to RTF i.e. a start table header element with no closing element. 
This issue though was self-induced as I was trying to manually create and force 
a table header into the mix without closing it off. I think if the tree 
structure isn't correct it gets confused down the line and starts throwing out 
those messages.

I am not sure what sort of FO validation JFOR used, but it might be worth just 
checking over the structure even if it did work before.

As a side note, from my understanding JFOR was donated to FOP a while ago so I 
imagine both projects were merged as FOP also has the ability to generate RTF 
from FO. Have you tried converting your FO using the latest version of FOP and 
see if you get the same thing? Maybe it was an issue which has subsequently 
been resolved. FOP has good FO validation so if there is something wrong I 
imagine it would highlight it. If it is however reproducible in FOP, we can 
create a bug to add to the list.

Regards,

Robert Meyer

From: romit.s...@ge.com
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: JFOR 0.7.1 behaving weird
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:29:41 +0530

Hi All,  My environment has been upgraded from jdk1.4 to jdk1.6  and from 
Solaris Unix box to Linux2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 x86_64  Box with Oracle 11g for 
connectivity from 10g earlierBut the RTF generated by JFOR 0.7.1 is looking 
very different from the earlier versionThe header and footer is getting 
enlarged and thus looking very odd..though the content is fineWhile looking at 
the log I got this 
message----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rendering
 complete : RTF_Quote  0.092 secs.jfor.INFO:jfor V0.7.1 - setting up 
conversion...jfor.INFO:Parsing xsl:fo document...jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column 
width not defined,using 200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not 
defined,using 200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.WARNING:fo:table-column width not defined,using 
200.0jfor.INFO:Writing out RTF...jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxxx.com/images/xxxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxxx.com/images/xxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Writing image 
'http://tst1-xxxxx.com/images/xxxx.jpg'.jfor.INFO:Write bookmark 
'terminator'.jfor.INFO:Done converting xsl:fo to RTF.jfor.DEBUG:conversion took 
585 
milliseconds.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Can you suggest any clue where I should be looking????I have migrated all the 
xsl files that were used earlier ThanksRomit Saha                               
            

Reply via email to