basically, relatively little effort has been spent on RTF support; we always welcome patches submitted by interested parties
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Simon Steiner <[email protected]> wrote: > Sending to mailing list > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michele Zamparelli [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 24 March 2015 10:08 > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: FOP 1.1 and RTF > > Hallo, > > we have been using Apache FOP to generate PDF from DocBook since 2012 for > a project at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mbse4md/ > Now we are being asked if we can produce RTF files, and using Apache FOP > support would appear to be the most natural thing to do. > > I noticed though that the official FOP-1.1 seems to have an issue with > that (or so says https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2182), and > furthermore (even when using daily builds version of FOP), it seems that > something is wrong with page counting and maybe with internal references (I > am not an expert of these things, I just dumbly look at the produced output > and compare it with the PDF one). > > Apologies if you are not the right addressees, but I wanted to ask if any > plans are there to fix these things. > I am not knowledgeable of free software development paradigms, but would > this be something which could be supported by a monetary contribution? > > thanks, > > Michele > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
