On 10/17/2016 03:26 PM, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there will
> now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart
> Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names ("foreman
> proxy").
That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims to
be the glue between the other two.
I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other
standards is a common mistake.
To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I
had to choose just one.
+1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice.
+1 for Foreman Proxy
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
