On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Greg Sutcliffe <greg.sutcli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> More generally, does it make sense for someone to do an audit of the most > common > places that plugins hook in, and make sure we have tests for them? > I don't think its a lack of tests, but rather someone updates a method and its tests for it without realizing its used by a plugin. I wonder if there is a way to do code coverage of plugins just like you can do for tests? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
