@Timo, Thanks for your feedback, That’s a good suggestion. Will do! > On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Timo Goebel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks good to me. +1 > I'm wondering if we could add proposed items to indicate that something is > activated / deactivated. > > - Timo > >> On 13 Mar 2017, at 04:45, June Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> HI, All >> >> Recently I have been working on the Foreman Icon Usage Analysis and created >> a proposal for the icon usage. >> In this proposal, we addressed some things as following: >> >> 1, Icon usage guideline - Icons must first and foremost communicate meaning >> in a graphical user interface >> 2, Proposal for when to use icon alone - Icons alone should only be >> permitted when at least two out of the following three conditions apply >> * Space is very limited (i.e., too small for text alone). >> * The icons are mostly universal recognition from users (e.g., Home, >> Search, Edit) >> * The icon represents an object with a strong physical analog or a visual >> attribute (e.g., a printer icon to access printer attributes). >> Tooltips are required for icons when they are used alone. >> 3, Proposal for when to use icon+label, and label alone >> * If space allows, icons combined with text is best. Selective use of >> icons with text makes certain items stand out more or add visual interest. >> It may also improve the scanability of the items. >> * As mentioned in the previous page, Icons must first and foremost >> communicate meaning, if there is an icon that can deliver this meaning, then >> we will use Icon+Label, if not, use Label alone. >> 4, Proposal for how to use icon >> * In a button group, it should keep consistent for all buttons with or >> without icons. >> * Not suggest to use icon on the navigation menu ( nav bar, tab ) unless >> adding the status icons such as warning or error icons. >> 5, Proposal for some common icons in Foreman >> 6, Proposal for some status icons in Foreman. >> >> The detail information is in the PDF file, please have a review. >> Before I begin to work on the next action[1], I’d love to get everyone’s >> feedback. >> >> [1]Next action: 1, Create xwiki page for the guideline >> 2, Send PR to fix the inconsistent icon with PatternFly >> >> Thanks >> June - UXD Team >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "foreman-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> <foreman Icon proposal.pdf> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "foreman-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
JUNE ZHANG ASSOCIATE MANAGER, UXD TEAM [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> T: 8388231 <https://redhatbrand.github.io/redhat-email-signature/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
