> Why is this sub-par performance? How long do you think it should take? Is > this an increase over previous? Initial processing time, whether on-demand > or not, is typically the longest sync you'll encounter for a repository > given all of the data that has to be downloaded and processed.
We are taking metadata from CDN/upstream repo and simply "copying" them into Pulp, there is no filtering applied or anything. It looks like Pulp processes this "from scratch" while it could simply "trust" the upstream metadata and just copy it? Then I'd expect minutes, but not forty. I understand there is some design in Pulp and some processing is going on there for the initial sync, but I expected on-demand policy to be even faster. I wonder if there are any plans improving initial sync in Pulp3 maybe. BK: I haven't compared with mrepo/createrepo or createrepo_c. -- Later, Lukas @lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
