On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:52:39AM +0100, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:36 +0100, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
That said, I've not really been involved with the RPMs, so I'm unsure
if this causes a bigger headache for Yum users than Apt users. I'm
also unsure of the work required to create an SCL, but if it's non-
trivial then I'd be looking to CentOS to collaborate on a Rails SCL
for everyone to use - for just ourselves, then vendoring seems
easier.
I spoke to a few people I know about this, and it seems there's not
much appetite for making new SCLs. We might be able to attract
contributors once it's created, but I think we should assume the effort
for creating/maintaining SCLs will fall on us initially.
Do we have any conclusions on this thread? It's going to matter for
1.17 which is getting closer by the day.
Personally I feel an updated RoR SCL is the way to go for 1.17 and to
prove that I'm willing to invest the time to make it a reality. After
1.16 RC2 is out I'm going to spend time on it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
