Le vendredi 28 novembre 2008 à 09:10 +0100, Daniel Baumann a écrit : > about rifituti2.. > > either both the source and binary package will be named rifituti2, then > we can upload this alongside to rifituti, and once it passed NEW, remove > rifituti. advantage: it's fair against previous upstream to not claim > his name and distinguish rifituti and rifituti2, disadvantage it has to > pass NEW and that will take a couple of weeks :/ > > or we just name both source and binary package rifituti by 'hijacking' > that. i personally would not prefere this.
s/rifituti/rifiuti/g I personally prefer the first solution too. I know some projects that use rifiuti (like ptk for exemple) that could be, one day, included in Debian. As those kind packages would depends on rifiuti, it's better to keep 1 and 2 alongside until all interesting projects have moved to rifiuti2. -- Christophe Monniez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FCCU _______________________________________________ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
