Hi Alexander, Le jeudi 03 nov. 2011 à 16:15:00 (+0100 CET), Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : > Hi! > > Many thanks for your work on the rkhunter package, I'm using it on quite > some machines. However, I would be very interested in having backports > of the package available (via backports.d.o). Backporting rkhunter > seems also to be quite easy, but being just a user and not deeper > involved in it's packaging or development, I'm wondering if there could > be a reason not to backport it? Surely I'm not the first one interested > in one.
Actually, yes, you are the first one to ask for it which partly explains why there is no backport for rkhunter. > If there's no reason, would you mind if I upload a backport to the > archive, or would you prefer to do it on your own? I can do this myself if that's fine for you. I however would like to upload the 1.3.8-10 version first which fixes the bug you have just reported (BTW, thanks for the patch), as well as #644326. I also agree there shouldn't be any problem with the backport, hence I'll upload it as soon as the new version enters in testing. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ <jul...@kirya.net> ~ <jul...@debian.org> : :' : Debian Developer & Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 _______________________________________________ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel