+1 from my perspective. This appears to me to be a sensible approach. The instructions on the wiki would certainly be simpler, since they'd be whittled down to only contain user/password info and perhaps personal repo setups.
/ermo Michael K. Johnson skrev: > I'd like to suggest a development package that can be updated in the > repository and contains all the necessary contexts. Then a developer > could do something like: > > ~/.rmakerc: > includeConfigFile /etc/foresight/development/rmake.config > > ~/.conaryrc: > includeConfigFile /etc/foresight/development/conary.confg > > Those are probably terrible suggestions for the names of the files, > but you get the idea. Then people wouldn't have to keep copying > changed context data from a wiki page. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
