Hello Marco,

great to hear from you. I will take a look at your cartridge ASAP.


Marco.Paga wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently working on a WSDL cartridge and would like to receive
> feedback about it. I should mention that the produced WSDL files are
> not working!
> 
> A specific question is how to automate the testing? Do you have any
> best pratices how to verify that the XML has syntactically and
> semantically valid content?
> Thanks a lot.
> 

Look at Karstens reply.
The best way to prove your artifacts (in general) is to write Unit tests.
The test checks funktionality with is described by a semantical correct code
snipped. If the syntactical correctness is a precondition of the test. So
you can test bouth.


Marco.Paga wrote:
> 
> You can find the work in progress version there:
> http://code.google.com/p/oaw-wsdl-cartridge/ . I'm pushing the
> cartridge forward until it stable enough to ask if it could go into
> the fornax platform.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marco
> 
Fornax is also a developer platform. You are invited to benefit from the
Fornax-Platform already during developing.

Regards 
Darius Jockel
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/WSDL-Cartridge%3A-Testing-strategy-tf4622985s17564.html#a13213380
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Fornax-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer

Reply via email to