We have got an interesting comment in http://www.fornax-platform.org/tracker/browse/CSC-173 CSC-173 that it is not a good idea to have the repository definition in the pom files.
Another opinion: http://www.nabble.com/-fornax-repository--missing-equinox-dependency-to14252094s17564.html#a14278216 Does the definition in the pom takes precedence over definition in settings.xml? I started this thread to gather more opinions. What do you think? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Repositories-in-pom-tp14660711s17564p14660711.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
