See my previous answer. If opposite == null then it is uni directional association.
Darth wrote: > > Is this a fair assumption - > > > if ref.opposite = null but "this" is part of references, that itself says > that its a uni directional assosiation. Since if it wasnt a uni > directional association, it wont be in the references list in the 1st > place for the current object being avaluated. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-figure-out-if-a-relation-%28reference%29-is-Bi-Directional--tp18099001s17564p18099602.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
