Hi,
Yes, the text2uml follows a specific grammar that is close to uml. I do not
know how it would be possible to convert from an "arbitrary" grammar, but i
would also be interested in the solution.
Regards,
attila
Martin Homik wrote:
>
> I followed the online tutorial and I have the impression that Text2UML can
> convert only models that respect a specific grammar whose terminology is
> quite close to UML class diagrams. Is Text2UML fixed to that specific
> grammer? Or does Text2UML support the conversion of any grammer specified
> with Xtext. Here is an example:
>
> textual DSL grammer (taken from a Java Magazine):
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> MyModel:
> (types+=Type)*;
>
> Type:
> BusinessObject | Datatype;
>
> BusinessObject:
> "bo" name=ID "{"
> (properties+=Property)*
> "}";
>
> Property:
> type=TypeRef name=ID;
>
> TypeRef:
> name=[Type|ID](multi?="[]")?;
>
> An example Model (taken from a Java Magazine):
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> bo Person {
> String name
> Address address
> Order[] orders
> PhoneNumber[] phones
> }
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Text2UML%3A-conversion-of-arbitrary-textual-DSLs-tp23312497s17564p23365508.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations
Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of
expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry
leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf
and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
_______________________________________________
Fornax-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
