PaloT wrote:
>
> Nice how far and fast we should go. My question is if we need support
> for NOT paging functions. When page parameter is null we should return
> all results. When paging parameter is filled we should follow it.
> Only reason for keeping no paging interface is backward compatibility
> but we can break it with new version, can't we?
>
> Pavel
>
I think we should support both variants, not only for backward
compatibility. Some domain objects are known to be few, and paging is not
needed, then you would not complicate things. I'm not talking about
generated crud gui.
/Patrik
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-sculptor--pagination-tp20636538s17564p25861662.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Fornax-developer mailing list
Fornax-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer